Limble CMMS

Pros

Limble has been instrumental in implementing a maintenance reliability program here at RIE. As a power user and for the operators submitting work requests, the Limble system is user-friendly. I like that anyone can submit a work request without needing to log into Limble, and I like that the requestors get updates on the work requests they submit. Customer service for Limble is remarkable, and my CSM [sensitive content hidden] always answers my questions in a very timely fashion. [sensitive content hidden]did an excellent job teaching me the ropes of Limble, and I am very pleased to have those training recordings and all the great training on Limble's YouTube channel.

Cons

I have not found anything I dislike about Limble. It is extremely customizable, so if there is something you don't like or you want to add something, you are more than likely able to change/add those things in Limble.

Alternatives Considered

MaintainX and UpKeep

Reasons for Switching to Limble CMMS

One of the biggest reasons I chose Limble was the stellar customer service reviews. I entered the quest for a CMMS, thinking I knew what I wanted. When I started reviewing the three systems, Limble was not at the top of my list. Another reason I chose Limble was because of the all-in pricing. I don't have to pay extra for training/implementation.

Pros

Limble is easy to use well organized. Assigning pm's and work orders is a breeze.

Cons

Nothing really to dislike. It takes some time to get started, but after that it saves time and adds productivity.

Alternatives Considered

UpKeep

Reasons for Switching to Limble CMMS

I liked the app. The mobile and desktop app looked very similar.

Pros

UI is mostly straightforward.
Communication through Limble between mechanics and drivers is generally smooth.
Desktop/web use is slightly better than the app.

Cons

Immense amount of wasted time logging back in and reloading work orders as Limble is constantly closing or reporting an error that requires refreshing. Also huge wasted time putting parts in a work order multiple times as they often don't save. Parts that are confirmed on a WO will sometimes not be taken from inventory. Parts search page is terrible, the part you're looking for will appear as you type in the number but the list resets itself before you can click on the part. Comments will often not save at all or save with words in different order than typed. Generally frustrating and feels tedious to use. Automatically playing a meme GIF after closing a WO/PM feels childish and patronizing, with the icing on the cake being an error message appearing when you press the button to turn it off.

Pros

It is simple to use.
Tracking inventory and assigning parts to assets.
The ability to customize work orders.

Cons

Not being able to attach multiple assets to one work order. It could possibly be done as a suggestion with the development team.

Alternatives Considered

Infor M3 and eMaint CMMS

Reasons for Choosing Limble CMMS

MP2 software was difficult to use and hard to manage. It was not being supported any longer.

Reasons for Switching to Limble CMMS

Limble was the lowest cost proposal. This product allows all plant employees to have easy, mobile access to all inventory, parts, work requests, and preventative maintenance tasks. The cloud based system allows software updates to be administered automatically, meaning the Power Plant will always have the most up-to-date version. Besides access to the software, the annual price covers set up, maintenance fees, data backup, and instant customer support. The most crucial features the Power Plant needs in a CMMS are inventory management, work order capabilities, plant status quick view, usability, and scheduling abilities.

Pros

I love how simple it is to operate. It feels very intuitive.

Cons

Not a con necessarily but so many capabilities makes some of the functions overwhelming to understand. How ever when you have people like [sensitive content hidden] it becomes less intimidating.