Amazon RDS Reviews

Pros

It caters to all types of requirements in terms of size, it can handle any amount of data
The pricing is good and even a person starting out his website or server can use this to maintain 100% uptime of his database.
You can control a lot of things from the Control Panel of AWS which include monitoring CPU usage, number of connections. It provides easy rebooting as well.

Cons

There was nothing that I did not like about this software. I am still using it and it solves my use case perfectly.

Pros

ease of setup
ease of taking snapshots
no configurational drainers
very easy to set up alerts for monitoring problems in the database
debugging is a breeze.

Cons

It is easy to get lost without an UI.
also replicating databases can get stuck sometimes if you don't know what you are doing.
replication can be pain depending upon whether you want (master-master) or (master-slaves)

Alternatives Considered

Google Cloud

Switched From

Google Cloud

Reasons for Switching to Amazon RDS

GCP was sort of handing off sensitive data over to Google and flying blind. AWS RDS debugging is much more useful when a problem arises. aws was a no contest choice despite it's expenditure.

Pros

Its saves time of their employees, productivity increased and cost of data management is reduced

Cons

Their cost is high, because they make monopoly and less competitive.

Pros

The best thing about Amazon RDS is, it automatically take backups of the database which increase more reliable systems so basically it supports recovery at that point.

Cons

The least liked thing about Amazon RDS is there is no guarantee of hardware performance and also sudo access is to be provided.

Pros

Amazon is getting good at putting DB in the cloud that before you know it, it will be as easy and syncing data to another computer.
Amazon is in the right track and not for long other companies will follow and make their disaster recovery simple to do.

Cons

Amazon still has a long way to go to make every database work seamless, but they have the right idea and concepts and it will only be a matter of time.
The pricing is something to get use to until it goes down and the demand get larger.

Pros

- Great stability and performance
- Great technical support
- You almost don't need to mind at any configuration or database servers anymore

Cons

Maybe the costs, but it depends. For small databases the RDS may not be a good idea but for large ones, you'll probably spend less than maintaining you own infrastructure

Pros

I like that I don't have to worry about my database as much - RDS takes care of all of the details. Security, scaling and uptime are all baked in to the service.

Cons

Like all AWS products, it has a learning curve to figure out. And you don't get unlimited control - if you want that you have to deploy your own database servers.

Pros

Amazon RDS allows creating DB instances in a very few clicks with full customization like engine type, size of class required, connectivity, availability, and durability.
Also, all monitoring, eventing, and logs are very handy and displayed on the pictorial representation dashboard.

Cons

Honestly, Amazon RDS fulfills all the use cases for me and I haven't spotted any disadvantage in it.

Pros

I use this service daily and it is really powerful, especially if you need to manage hundreds of databases without having to worry about anything. pointing in time backup is the most powerful feature ever.

Cons

For the target audience of the service there are no cons, perhaps a little costs for smaller projects.

Pros

I really like this software and I would sincerally recommend it. It is simple, practical and easy to use.

Cons

I think the only thing that I don't quite like is the cost. I think it is a little expensive.

Pros

It is scalable, we tried it on different projects, small and big and it performed well.With just a few clicks, you can easily add or remove database instances, adjust computing resources, and automatically scale your database as your application grow.

Cons

One bad thing is that developers have limited control over the underlying infrastructure and configuration.

Pros

We use Aurora, which gives us a lot of flexibility in scale and size. Not having to manage clusters or database consistency across a number of different machines is amazing.

Cons

RDS, and aurora, generally lags behind the current state of postgres, which comes with the territory.

Alternatives Considered

Google Cloud

Pros

He been using AWS RDS for like 4 years now, & its the best Database management tool we ever tried. Here its super easy to operate & scale your database. The console is easy to understand & somehow intuitive if you been working with databases in past. Multi-AZ feature gives you power if you cannot afford any downtime. RDS takes backup automatically so no worries of loosing any data.

Cons

Only dark side of AWS RDS is its pricing, do have a watch on what they billing you. Keep track of your usage on CloudWatch and Trusted Adviser. It may get expensive not not affordable if you use it without sincere approach.

Pros

You can set it up with a few clicks only, and you get a fully managed database instance: forget about backups, OS updates, etc. It even sets up High Availability for you if needed, creating multiple nodes. You can choose the resources of the system (CPU, Hard Disk, memory) and other configurations (DBMS parameters, extra read nodes…)

Cons

You can only scale resources by using a bigger instance type (it means more CPU and more RAM) or replica nodes. Eg. you cannot set up a Raid disk configuration to improve I/O.

Pros

Amazon continues to achieve the best in this field as always. I think it is good that it dominates the database market because it is a good example and competitive environment for other similar applications.

Cons

I have not had a bad experience, I am extremely pleased. Using amazon credits jointly on all services is an impressive feature. I did not have any compatibility problems and I was very satisfied with the overall quality.

Pros

- the ease of setting up and getting ready with the first instance
- the multitude of options when getting to advanced level
- the performance of the Aurora engine

Cons

- could not get the fastest performance being connected from remote vs connect from another Aws instance. A minimum 60ms overhead is added to every query, which disappears running the client on an ec2

Pros

A lot of server tiers available to choose from, good when you need to start out with a smaller instance. Like to option to quickly create snapshots or restore a backup. Multi-az is a nice freaute to have that can save your business when things go south.

Cons

Halted instances are booted back up after 7 days automatically, so you can't really have an instance that is stopped for a long time. Since it's not a self-hosted service, there are some low level features that are missing.

Pros

Backed by AWS - corporate level product for an affordable price.

Cons

No support included. Need to figure out your issues on your own or pay (extensively) for support.

Alternatives Considered

Google Cloud

Reasons for Choosing Amazon RDS

More features / dependability

Reasons for Switching to Amazon RDS

Recognition

Pros

RDS is highly available, easy to scale and extremely customisable. Whether I want to set up a small MySQL database or a PostgreSQL instance to be run at scale, RDS is my first port of call.

Cons

RDS can start to get pricey as the instance sizes increase. For most consumers with relatively optimised database queries, this would not be an issue - but for those that have not aligned their applications for efficiency, this could be problematic.

Pros

It is one of the most simple and lightweight solutions available in the market with amazing scalability as per the usage, its disaster recovery is great.
The read replica structure helps to manage a huge load. Supports various DB services such as Oracle, MySQL, Postgres and SQL Server.

Cons

The management of the RDS parameters becomes a difficult task if you are not familiar with the UI. The price might be on the higher side for small projects with large data storage.

Pros

Almost 100% uptime very reliable compared to own installation of mysql on EC2, auto backup, auto update etc are seamless and very stable product, aurora is a very promising technology for scalability too

Cons

Not much the parameter groups UI is kind of stinks and has some default parameters configured is not good, for eg: definer statements need to be removed before uploading data/stureture from backups

Pros

With Amazon RDS, you longer need to install, set up and manage your database system. Just Choose suitable Database system, choose suitable instance type, configure a few things, and you database will be ready. You do not need to install or set up anything, amazon will take care of these things. You can straight away starting your database.

Cons

You will be charged a hefty amount for its services by Amazon.

Pros

RDS is a highly scalable database and it can scale up or down depending on the resource and workloads it has and it works smoothly even for high data volumes and increased traffic. It automatically backs up data and we can restore our data even if we lost it. This is a highly available db because it automatically stores data in another availability zone and if a failure happens, then the primary database will be replaced with that replica.

Cons

With our application requirement, we have to choose the supported db engine. That db engine running inside RDS has some limitations other than running it in our machine. So that is the drawback I see.

Pros

InexpensiveEase to useData security is highly recommended

Cons

Affected by system crashes which May result in data loss

Pros

The managed nature of the hosting takes a lot of workload off of my team, letting us focus on more important things. It's definitely worth it.

Cons

Making changes is always a bit scary, especially with respect to reboots. They also take a long time with no clear progress indication.